IFRS 18 Standards and SAP Readiness: Financial Transformation Towards 2027
- Osman Bayram
- 1 day ago
- 8 min read
The financial world is bracing for one of the most significant reporting revolutions in recent years. Issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), the IFRS 18 standard, Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements, will become mandatory on January 1, 2027. While many CFOs and finance leaders may view this date as the distant future, the underlying timeline points to a much more unforgiving reality: the requirement for comparative data.
Because IFRS 18 introduces fundamental changes to the presentation of financial statements, the reports submitted in 2027 must be presented comparatively with 2026 figures. Consequently, your SAP systems (whether S/4HANA or ECC) must be live and fully capable of generating data in the new format by January 1, 2026. If you delay your system transformation until late 2026 or 2027, you will be forced to retrospectively reclassify millions of journal entry line items, rely heavily on manual adjustments, and face severe compliance risks during audit processes.
So, how can you avoid this chaos and maintain your competitive advantage? What needs to change in your SAP architecture before we enter 2026? Let's explore this process step-by-step through the Finpro vision.
What is IFRS 18 and Why Does It Matter?
IFRS 18 is ushering in a new era in financial reporting standards. This standard introduces a more transparent and consistent approach to financial accounting and reporting. It is particularly critical for large and mid-sized enterprises in terms of enhancing the comparability of financial statements, boosting investor confidence, and ensuring global compliance.
Before diving into the implementation steps, let's break down the three fundamental IFRS 18 innovations triggering architectural changes within your SAP system:
New Categories and Subtotals in the Statement of Profit or Loss: Income and expenses will no longer be classified arbitrarily or solely by their function. Three distinct categories are now mandatory: Operating, Investing, and Financing. Additionally, standardized subtotals such as "Operating Profit" and "Profit Before Financing and Income Tax" must be reported.
Management Performance Measures (MPMs): Non-GAAP metrics frequently presented to investors, such as "Adjusted EBITDA" or "Adjusted Operating Profit," must now be mandatorily disclosed in the notes to the financial statements and will be subject to independent audit.
Aggregation and Disaggregation: The use of catch-all accounts like "Other" or "Miscellaneous" will be strictly regulated. Material items will need to be disaggregated in a more detailed and transparent manner, either in the primary financial statements or in the footnotes.
New Statement of Profit or Loss Categories: Everything Now Has Its Place
IFRS 18 prohibits the arbitrary listing of income and expenses, strictly dividing the P&L statement into three main categories:
Operating Category: This includes all income and expenses arising from the company's core business activities. However, the most significant innovation introduced by IFRS 18 is that this acts as the "default" category. In other words, if an income or expense does not fit into the "Investing" or "Financing" categories, it is automatically classified as Operating. This mandates that expenses companies previously tried to hide from core operating profit by labeling them as "unusual" or "one-off" items must now be directly reported within this category.
Investing Category: Returns (and related expenses) generated from associates, joint ventures, and cash/cash equivalents are tracked here. This brings absolute transparency to the performance of assets held purely for investment purposes, completely independent of the company's core operations.
Financing Category: This exclusively encompasses costs related to funding the company (such as interest expenses) and interest income derived from cash and cash equivalents.
This structure ensures that investors can clearly see the company's "true" operational performance, stripped of financing costs and isolated investments.
Management Performance Measures (MPMs): Non-GAAP Metrics Under Audit
For years, company management has presented investors with custom, non-GAAP metrics, such as "Adjusted EBITDA" or "Profit Excluding Net FX Differences", that have no basis in international reporting standards. IFRS 18 does not prohibit these practices; rather, it pulls them directly into the financial statements, rendering them strictly auditable.
Mandatory Footnote Disclosure: If management utilizes a profit measure not defined by IFRS in their external communications (e.g., annual reports, investor presentations), they are now required to disclose it as a "Management Performance Measure (MPM)" within the financial statement footnotes.
Reconciliation Requirement: Companies must provide a step-by-step, quantitative reconciliation demonstrating how these MPMs bridge to the most directly comparable IFRS 18 subtotal (e.g., Operating Profit). This reconciliation must also explicitly account for tax effects and non-controlling interests.
Audit Scope: This is the most critical paradigm shift. "Adjusted" metrics are now subject to independent auditor review. Consequently, these background adjustments must possess a robust audit trail and rule-based calculation logic, especially within SAP systems. The era of manual adjustments managed in Excel spreadsheets is officially coming to an end.
Aggregation and Disaggregation: The "Other Expenses" Line Item
The most opaque corner of financial statements has historically been the "Other Operating Expenses" or "Miscellaneous Income" lines. IFRS 18 severely restricts the use of these catch-all accounts by effectively redefining the application of "materiality."
Nature vs. Function Distinction: Even if companies elect to present their expenses by "Function" (e.g., Sales, Marketing, R&D) on the face of the P&L, they are now strictly mandated to disclose the breakdown of these expenses by "Nature" (e.g., Depreciation, Personnel Expenses, Material Costs) in the footnotes.
Meaningful Labeling: If items aggregated under the "Other" heading reach a material threshold relative to the total, they must be disaggregated into sub-classifications with specific labels that accurately describe their nature.
The IFRS 18 Compliance Process in SAP S/4HANA and ECC Systems
These new regulations are not a mere cosmetic fix that can be resolved by simply tweaking a few reporting formats, such as the Financial Statement Version (FSV), within your SAP ERP (ECC) or SAP S/4HANA system. Instead, they demand an in-depth architectural overhaul, extending from core master data down to the document splitting logic:
1. Chart of Accounts and Master Data Revision
Your current Uniform Chart of Accounts (THP) or global chart of accounts may not directly support the Operating, Investing, and Financing classifications demanded by IFRS 18.
What Needs to be Done?: New attributes or custom fields must be defined within the G/L (General Ledger) account master data in SAP. Every income and expense account must be explicitly tagged to indicate which of the core IFRS 18 categories it belongs to.
SAP S/4HANA Advantage: If you are using S/4HANA, you can leverage the flexibility of the Universal Journal (ACDOCA table) to architect how you will utilize the "Extension Ledger" logic for IFRS 18 adaptations. Because an investment holding company and a manufacturing company may need to report interest income from the exact same account code under entirely different categories (Operating vs. Investing), making company code-level differentiations within the account master data becomes critically important.
2. Restructuring Financial Statement Versions (FSV / Global Accounting Hierarchy)
The new subtotals introduced by IFRS 18 directly impact your existing OB58 (Financial Statement Version) structures in SAP or the Fiori-based "Global Accounting Hierarchy" in S/4HANA.
What Needs to be Done?: New nodes for "Operating Profit" and "Profit Before Financing and Income Tax" must be defined within the SAP system. These subtotals, which are currently calculated manually or via Excel, must now become standard system outputs.
The Challenge: Certain expenses and revenues may need to be allocated across multiple categories based on their nature. In this scenario, merely altering the FSV nodes is insufficient; dynamic reporting structures capable of reading different dimensions of the exact same posting are required.
3. Data Architecture and CO-PA for Management Performance Measures (MPMs)
Perhaps the most significant technical and operational challenge lies here. Most companies calculate metrics such as "Adjusted EBITDA" outside of their core SAP system—typically relying on external consolidation tools or Excel spreadsheets. IFRS 18 now mandates a robust audit trail and a formal reconciliation table bridging these metrics directly to the primary financial statements.
What Needs to be Done?: If one-off or unusual expenses (e.g., restructuring costs) are excluded from your management performance measures, you must establish a systemic mechanism within your SAP architecture to flag these specific line items.
Solutions: By leveraging S/4HANA Margin Analysis or traditional profitability segments, transactions can be tagged with an "exceptional item" or "management reporting exception" code right at the time of posting. Consequently, both the standard IFRS operating profit and the specific Management Performance Measure (MPM) can be extracted from the exact same database with a single click, allowing the system to instantly generate the reconciliation bridge between the two.
4. Document Disaggregation and Cost Allocations
Under IFRS 18's "Disaggregation" rules, expenses will need to be reported with much greater clarity based on their nature or function (e.g., production, marketing, general and administrative). While many companies successfully maintain this distinction within Cost Center accounting (CO), they frequently rely on a single catch-all account on the Financial Accounting (FI) side.
What Needs to be Done?: Your SAP Document Splitting rules must be thoroughly reviewed. New rules must be configured for any postings that currently fail to achieve detailed disaggregation at the Profit Center or segment level.
Cost Allocation: Your month-end cost allocation cycles (Assessment and Distribution Cycles) must be updated. This ensures that costs are transferred to the correct accounts and centers without distorting or losing the original "nature of expense" within the IFRS 18 "Operating" category.
5. Statement of Cash Flows Integration
While IFRS 18 alters the Statement of Profit or Loss, it also introduces a significant consequential amendment to the IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows standard. For cash flow statements prepared using the indirect method, it is now a strict mandate that the starting point must be "Operating Profit."
What Needs to be Done?: The architectures that automatically generate the Cash Flow statement within SAP—whether utilizing traditional formula-based structures, SAP Group Reporting, or SAP BPC—must be re-parameterized to shift the starting point from Net Income (or Net Profit) to Operating Profit.
Mappings must be reconfigured from the ground up to ensure that reconciling items (such as depreciation, provisions, etc.) are accurately routed to their correct lines within the cash flow statement.
The Roadmap for IFRS 18 and SAP Transformation with Finpro
As a leading consulting firm in SAP financial transformation and e-Transformation projects, Finpro empowers enterprises to successfully navigate this complex transition. Throughout the IFRS 18 compliance journey, Finpro’s deep expertise drives measurable impact across the following areas:
Current State Assessment: An in-depth review of your existing SAP systems and financial processes.
Compliance Planning: Formulating a strategic, end-to-end roadmap tailored to IFRS 18 requirements.
System Configuration: Executing the necessary architectural setups and adaptations within your SAP S/4HANA and ECC environments.
Training & Change Management: Equipping your finance and IT teams with the knowledge to seamlessly adapt to the new standards.
Testing & Validation: Rigorous testing to guarantee the absolute accuracy and integrity of your comparative period data.
This comprehensive approach ensures that your financial reporting processes are not only fully automated but also transformed into a sustainable strategic advantage.
Key Considerations for IFRS 18 Readiness
Certain critical aspects must not be overlooked during the IFRS 18 compliance journey:
Data Quality: The accuracy and consistency of financial data form the bedrock of reporting. Data cleansing and standardization must take top priority.
System Integration: Seamless compliance must be established within SAP S/4HANA and ECC environments, and the transition phases must be meticulously managed.
Training and Awareness: Educating both finance and IT teams on the new standards significantly drives implementation success.
Continuous Monitoring: Even after the IFRS 18 implementation goes live, performance metrics and reporting processes must be subject to regular reviews.
Adhering to these pillars guarantees the long-term sustainability and reliability of your financial reporting processes.
Creating a Strategic Advantage in Financial Transformation
IFRS 18 compliance and SAP adaptation are not merely regulatory obligations; they present a strategic opportunity for enterprises. With precise planning and execution, financial processes become automated, reporting cycles accelerate, and decision-making mechanisms are significantly strengthened.
Finpro’s deep expertise guides organizations through this transformation journey. By fully leveraging the capabilities of SAP technologies, the transparency and accuracy of financial data are maximized. Consequently, enterprises secure a competitive edge and drive sustainable growth.
To discover how to ready your SAP architecture for the IFRS 18 compliance process and optimize your financial reporting workflows, reach out to Finpro's experts. This critical roadmap will empower you to navigate your financial transformation with absolute confidence.
Comments